<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RAD Studio 2010 Review #12: &#8211; Tooling, Help, Unicode</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/</link>
	<description>...On the Wings of the Software Wind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:52:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ralf Kaiser</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralf Kaiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Way more usable and much much better than D2009’s Help??

Please highlight the word &quot;integer&quot; in the editor and press F1.

-------------------------------
Description
Embarcadero Technologies does not currently have any additional information. 
Please help us document this topic by using the wiki Discussion page. Click the 
Current Wiki Page button below to access the wiki.
-------------------------------

(the onle information about the topic &quot;integer&quot; - and that is only one example)

Is that better then in D2009?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way more usable and much much better than D2009’s Help??</p>
<p>Please highlight the word &#8220;integer&#8221; in the editor and press F1.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Description<br />
Embarcadero Technologies does not currently have any additional information.<br />
Please help us document this topic by using the wiki Discussion page. Click the<br />
Current Wiki Page button below to access the wiki.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>(the onle information about the topic &#8220;integer&#8221; &#8211; and that is only one example)</p>
<p>Is that better then in D2009?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Личная записная</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Личная записная</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-280</guid>
		<description>[...] в SOAP и DataSnap. Chris Bensen, чуть-чуть у WoW и снова у [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] в SOAP и DataSnap. Chris Bensen, чуть-чуть у WoW и снова у [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pratt</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-250</guid>
		<description>F11/F12 problem is with Classic Undocked mode.

I don&#039;t have access to D2010 yet so I don&#039;t know if they work as expected now.

For example I have 10 labels on a form. I click on 1st label, press F11 and change &quot;Name&quot; property. Then I click another label and press F11 again, &quot;Name&quot; property should get focus so I could type name but I have to doubleclick bc focus is not there.

Events have same problem, on &quot;Events&quot; I press CTRL ENTER for example on &quot;OnEnter&quot;, type //, press F12, F11 and try to press CTRL ENTER again but OI has lost focus.

QC39853
QC30150</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F11/F12 problem is with Classic Undocked mode.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have access to D2010 yet so I don&#8217;t know if they work as expected now.</p>
<p>For example I have 10 labels on a form. I click on 1st label, press F11 and change &#8220;Name&#8221; property. Then I click another label and press F11 again, &#8220;Name&#8221; property should get focus so I could type name but I have to doubleclick bc focus is not there.</p>
<p>Events have same problem, on &#8220;Events&#8221; I press CTRL ENTER for example on &#8220;OnEnter&#8221;, type //, press F12, F11 and try to press CTRL ENTER again but OI has lost focus.</p>
<p>QC39853<br />
QC30150</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wings of Wind</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Wings of Wind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Help is &#039;fixed&#039; in D2010
What do you mean with &quot;F11/F12 doesn&#039;t work properly&quot;? In D2010, at least for me, they work as expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help is &#8216;fixed&#8217; in D2010<br />
What do you mean with &#8220;F11/F12 doesn&#8217;t work properly&#8221;? In D2010, at least for me, they work as expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Joylon - so, maintaining source code compatibility was a &#039;major blunder&#039;? Many people would differ... That said, if you don&#039;t care for compatibility with older Delphi versions, add Character to your uses clause and call ToUpper (or TCharacter.Upper) instead of AnsiUpperCase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joylon &#8211; so, maintaining source code compatibility was a &#8216;major blunder&#8217;? Many people would differ&#8230; That said, if you don&#8217;t care for compatibility with older Delphi versions, add Character to your uses clause and call ToUpper (or TCharacter.Upper) instead of AnsiUpperCase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LDS</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>LDS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-239</guid>
		<description>&gt; Alphabetical ordering of new events ( WTF, who wanted this ?? )

I wanted it. See no reason why some methods should be alphabetically ordered and others not. Events are methods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Alphabetical ordering of new events ( WTF, who wanted this ?? )</p>
<p>I wanted it. See no reason why some methods should be alphabetically ordered and others not. Events are methods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LDS</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>LDS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-238</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d just point UnicodeUpperCase() or whatever else to the Ansi function

{$IFDEF UNICODE}
...
TUnicodeFunc = function(AText: string): string;
...
UnicodeUpperCase: TUnicodeFunc;
...
UnicodeUpperCase := @AnsiUpperCase;

to avoid the extra CALL/stack setup/RET - sometimes it may matter. Something they could have thought themselves. You get an indirect CALL, better than nothing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just point UnicodeUpperCase() or whatever else to the Ansi function</p>
<p>{$IFDEF UNICODE}<br />
&#8230;<br />
TUnicodeFunc = function(AText: string): string;<br />
&#8230;<br />
UnicodeUpperCase: TUnicodeFunc;<br />
&#8230;<br />
UnicodeUpperCase := @AnsiUpperCase;</p>
<p>to avoid the extra CALL/stack setup/RET &#8211; sometimes it may matter. Something they could have thought themselves. You get an indirect CALL, better than nothing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pratt</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-236</guid>
		<description>#1 reason I will stay in D7 is IDE, D200x IDE killed my productivity.

- Alphabetical ordering of new events ( WTF, who wanted this ?? )
- F11/F12 does not work properly
- New component palette ( fixed in 2010 )
- Help 

I will upgrade when all above gets fixed and 64bit version is available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1 reason I will stay in D7 is IDE, D200x IDE killed my productivity.</p>
<p>- Alphabetical ordering of new events ( WTF, who wanted this ?? )<br />
- F11/F12 does not work properly<br />
- New component palette ( fixed in 2010 )<br />
- Help </p>
<p>I will upgrade when all above gets fixed and 64bit version is available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wings of Wind</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Wings of Wind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-234</guid>
		<description>You know that they must support a smooth upgrade path for the old applications. About the &#039;cleanup effort&#039; I&#039;d rather see it by adding another set of routines to work like aliases to the old ones. Something like:

[sourcecode language=&#039;Delphi&#039;]

//just a proof of concept
function UnicodeUpperCase(aText: string): string;
begin
  Result:=AnsiUpperCase(aText);
end;
[/sourcecode]

What do you say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know that they must support a smooth upgrade path for the old applications. About the &#8216;cleanup effort&#8217; I&#8217;d rather see it by adding another set of routines to work like aliases to the old ones. Something like:</p>
<pre class="brush: delphi;">

//just a proof of concept
function UnicodeUpperCase(aText: string): string;
begin
  Result:=AnsiUpperCase(aText);
end;
</pre>
<p>What do you say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jolyon Smith</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Jolyon Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-232</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s holding me back from 2010 (and 2009) is &quot;Unicode Damage&quot;, as someone else put it very nicely.

In attempting to make old non-Unicode code &quot;just compile&quot; under the new Unicode regime, CodeGear made some horrendous blunders imho.

Just trying to get to grips with which version of Uppercase() to use was enough to give me a headache, especially when I discovered that the version that seems most appropriate to a UnicodeString is.... (drum roll please)... .ANSIUppercase()    WTF!!!


I have a feeling it&#039;s too much to ask for, but really a massive cleanup effort needs to go into rationalising the Unicode RTL support in the VCL to make it sensible for people actually writing Unicode applications, rather than people who have written ANSI applications and then want them to just behave as before, but with Unicode strings.

Properly supporting Unicode in an application just isn&#039;t as simple as that, and the approach taken in the RTL/VCL seems to make it frustratingly difficult (i.e. counter-intuitive) to actually implement what I would call &quot;real&quot; Unicode applications, i.e. ones that consciously consider and cater for the implications of Unicode, instead of just &quot;hoping for the best&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s holding me back from 2010 (and 2009) is &#8220;Unicode Damage&#8221;, as someone else put it very nicely.</p>
<p>In attempting to make old non-Unicode code &#8220;just compile&#8221; under the new Unicode regime, CodeGear made some horrendous blunders imho.</p>
<p>Just trying to get to grips with which version of Uppercase() to use was enough to give me a headache, especially when I discovered that the version that seems most appropriate to a UnicodeString is&#8230;. (drum roll please)&#8230; .ANSIUppercase()    WTF!!!</p>
<p>I have a feeling it&#8217;s too much to ask for, but really a massive cleanup effort needs to go into rationalising the Unicode RTL support in the VCL to make it sensible for people actually writing Unicode applications, rather than people who have written ANSI applications and then want them to just behave as before, but with Unicode strings.</p>
<p>Properly supporting Unicode in an application just isn&#8217;t as simple as that, and the approach taken in the RTL/VCL seems to make it frustratingly difficult (i.e. counter-intuitive) to actually implement what I would call &#8220;real&#8221; Unicode applications, i.e. ones that consciously consider and cater for the implications of Unicode, instead of just &#8220;hoping for the best&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wings of Wind</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Wings of Wind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-230</guid>
		<description>C++ received &lt;strong&gt;a lot&lt;/strong&gt; of attention in this Field Test. Please forgive me, but I&#039;m just a Delphi guy, that&#039;s all. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C++ received <strong>a lot</strong> of attention in this Field Test. Please forgive me, but I&#8217;m just a Delphi guy, that&#8217;s all. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boro</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Boro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-229</guid>
		<description>What I really like about last few product iterations, a part really improved functionality and quality, is that Codegear/Embarca... team started being much more selfconfident about Delphi product and future themselves which reflected then in things like more self-marketing, inside reviews like this one, interviews, customer/web communication  etc,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I really like about last few product iterations, a part really improved functionality and quality, is that Codegear/Embarca&#8230; team started being much more selfconfident about Delphi product and future themselves which reflected then in things like more self-marketing, inside reviews like this one, interviews, customer/web communication  etc,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Let me start by saying that RAD2010 seems to be an outstanding product.
Congratulations to Embarcadero. This release, really seems the one that will make us upgrade our development tools (still scattered by D5, BCB6, C++RAD2007).

What will help to upgrade? A strong and quick release of new versions from the third party component vendors. Granted, not a lot that EMB can do about it, but they can always offer some help. Speaking of 3rd parties tools, will QuickReports still be included?

Now, regarding some misses (understandably not everything could be fixed), it would be nice to feel some love to the C++ side of the tool. Case in point, still no way to have a report of memory leaks on a C++ application closing as there is in Delphi (ReportMemoryLeaksOnShutdown). Nowadays, with application servers running for months it&#039;s a must to be able to early (and natively) debug any leaks. And yes, there are better third party tools for that, but it&#039;s just something that has been asked on a prior live launch product preview and still didn&#039;t make it into this one.

But that&#039;s &quot;slightly&quot; OT, sorry. Bottom line is that for everything I&#039;ve seeing RAD2010 it&#039;s a truly, truly remarkable product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me start by saying that RAD2010 seems to be an outstanding product.<br />
Congratulations to Embarcadero. This release, really seems the one that will make us upgrade our development tools (still scattered by D5, BCB6, C++RAD2007).</p>
<p>What will help to upgrade? A strong and quick release of new versions from the third party component vendors. Granted, not a lot that EMB can do about it, but they can always offer some help. Speaking of 3rd parties tools, will QuickReports still be included?</p>
<p>Now, regarding some misses (understandably not everything could be fixed), it would be nice to feel some love to the C++ side of the tool. Case in point, still no way to have a report of memory leaks on a C++ application closing as there is in Delphi (ReportMemoryLeaksOnShutdown). Nowadays, with application servers running for months it&#8217;s a must to be able to early (and natively) debug any leaks. And yes, there are better third party tools for that, but it&#8217;s just something that has been asked on a prior live launch product preview and still didn&#8217;t make it into this one.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s &#8220;slightly&#8221; OT, sorry. Bottom line is that for everything I&#8217;ve seeing RAD2010 it&#8217;s a truly, truly remarkable product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Knopfli</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Knopfli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-215</guid>
		<description>&quot;…and what’s very neat is that Help tries to connect to Internet to grab the latest version of that piece of info from the corresponding Wiki page.&quot;

Why the Help ever got so seriously broken is beyond me. But this is good news.

I hope the updated wiki info can be downloaded and integrated into the help. For security reasons, not everyone likes connecting business critical PCs to the internet.

&quot;what holds you back to upgrade to Delphi 2010?&quot;

Unicode damage is still a big reason. All my 3rd party libraries are with source code, but to fix the TurboPower text editor is going to be a project in itself, something clients just expect to happen and I don&#039;t earn money on.

Also, lack of UnicoWS.dll support (target Win95/98/ME) is a problem on older industrial projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;…and what’s very neat is that Help tries to connect to Internet to grab the latest version of that piece of info from the corresponding Wiki page.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why the Help ever got so seriously broken is beyond me. But this is good news.</p>
<p>I hope the updated wiki info can be downloaded and integrated into the help. For security reasons, not everyone likes connecting business critical PCs to the internet.</p>
<p>&#8220;what holds you back to upgrade to Delphi 2010?&#8221;</p>
<p>Unicode damage is still a big reason. All my 3rd party libraries are with source code, but to fix the TurboPower text editor is going to be a project in itself, something clients just expect to happen and I don&#8217;t earn money on.</p>
<p>Also, lack of UnicoWS.dll support (target Win95/98/ME) is a problem on older industrial projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cobus Kruger</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Cobus Kruger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-214</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m on Software Assurance, so what is holding me back right now is availability of Delphi 2010 ;-)

But the more I read about it, the better it looks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on Software Assurance, so what is holding me back right now is availability of Delphi 2010 <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But the more I read about it, the better it looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichardS</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>RichardS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-213</guid>
		<description>Will definitely be using this version for production work unless there are any last minute issues discovered - am on Delphi 7 still even though because of software assurance I have all the recent versions - upgrading just seemed like more trouble than it was worth before now. But am really impressed with what you and others have blogged about so far - thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will definitely be using this version for production work unless there are any last minute issues discovered &#8211; am on Delphi 7 still even though because of software assurance I have all the recent versions &#8211; upgrading just seemed like more trouble than it was worth before now. But am really impressed with what you and others have blogged about so far &#8211; thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maarten</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-212</guid>
		<description>Everything I&#039;ve been hearing about D2010 sounds great so far. So indeed, the only thing that could hold me back would be unavailability of the 3rd party component libraries I use. (Currently using D2007 for most of the larger projects, although I use D2009 occasionally for smaller stuff). 

Come to think of it, that would be a really great feature for a future Delphi: downward (or upward, depending on how you look at it) compatibility of libraries so that you don&#039;t have to wait for all the vendors to make upgrades available -- that is, if the vendor itself is still available ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything I&#8217;ve been hearing about D2010 sounds great so far. So indeed, the only thing that could hold me back would be unavailability of the 3rd party component libraries I use. (Currently using D2007 for most of the larger projects, although I use D2009 occasionally for smaller stuff). </p>
<p>Come to think of it, that would be a really great feature for a future Delphi: downward (or upward, depending on how you look at it) compatibility of libraries so that you don&#8217;t have to wait for all the vendors to make upgrades available &#8212; that is, if the vendor itself is still available <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert</title>
		<link>http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/08/20/rad-studio-2010-review-12-tooling-help-unicode/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wings-of-wind.com/?p=161#comment-211</guid>
		<description>I will move from Delphi 2007 to 2010 now. Some 3rd party libaries weren&#039;t available shortly after the release of 2009, but now I will definitely move forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will move from Delphi 2007 to 2010 now. Some 3rd party libaries weren&#8217;t available shortly after the release of 2009, but now I will definitely move forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
